Browse full survey responses from each expert by selecting their name below:
The overall ranking represents the average of all responses provided by the expert — detailed responses to each dimension are provided below. Note that some participants provided their evaluation for a few dimensions only.
“Surveillance has, if anything, retreated. The IMF has done good work on revising its lending facilities, particularly the transformation of the CCL into the FCL, but no new countries that would immediately benefit, such as Spain, have been convinced to accept it. The attempt to consider debt management in the G20 has been abortive. Coordination of fiscal targets has not advanced. Discord remains on financing the European crisis. The IMF is still too small.”
“Basel III and FSB work are important first steps and should be recognized as such. Banks are already making moves to raise capital. Surveillance frameworks are improving. But the FSB and G20 work on these issues needs to be brought to intermediate conclusions and deadlines for action agreed.”
“ODA targets from Monterrey and Gleneagles remain unfulfilled. MDGs have provided an excellent framework for strategic action and time-bound targeting, but major multilateral and national development institutions have not sufficiently integrated them into their operations and strategic planning. Major G8 initiatives such as the Muskoka agreements on child and maternal health are still pending. There needs to be a better system of monitoring and accountability on past commitments. Innovative financing sources discussion is a distraction from the need to follow through on existing goals. Similarly, the post-2015 agenda is regressive: there is no need to take the focus off achieving the MDGs. We should have simply extended the deadline.”
“WTO process is being actively undermined by regional and bilateral negotiations.”
“The UNFCCC is dead. Climate change negotiations should be moved to the G20.”
Estimates between 85% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe, unanticipated major shock to the world economy, preventing sustained unemployment or inflation. International agreements are effective. Key institutions have strengthened their governance and accountability and have the tools and resources required to perform effectively.
Estimates between 80% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe shock to the world economy and to prevent sustained unemployment or inflation.
Estimates between 70% and 84% reflect some progress that inspires confidence in the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks Conditions are conducive to inclusive global economic growth.
Estimates between 60% and 79% reflect conditions that inspire confidence and that are conducive to growth.
Estimates between 55% and 69% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in long term, sustainable balanced growth, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.
Estimates between 45 and 54% represent stagnation in progress or regression, with low to negligible developments in international discussions or a lack of displayed interest. Public documents exclude mention of the topic or pay minimal due to the issue, with little to no developments in stability or growth.
Estimates between 40% and 59% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in the long term, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.
Estimates between 30 and 44% represent a level of regression sufficient to cause concern for the direction of long term growth. Conditions have not yet worsened significantly, but the global economy shows signs for concern.
Estimates between 20% and 39% represent some regression, pointing to non-negligible risks to the stability of the world economy if confronted by large-scale shocks.
Estimates between 15% and 29% represent some regression that instills concern for the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks. Indications suggest insufficient progress and conditions unfavorable to long term growth.
Estimates between 0% and 14% represent major regression towards a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy. Multilateral negotiations are at a standstill, and key institutions lack the tools and resources to perform effectively.
Estimates between 0% and 19% represent major regression toward a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy.