2013 CIGI Survey of Progress in International Economic Governance

The overall ranking represents the average of all responses provided by the expert — detailed responses to each dimension are provided below. Note that some participants provided their evaluation for a few dimensions only.

Macroeconomic and Financial Cooperation

35%

Question: How much progress has been made on macro-economic and international monetary cooperation in the last year?

“Ratification of the IMF ‘Seoul’ reform package is still overdue, despite the previously agreed-upon deadline of October 2013. Macroeconomic cooperation under the G20 process has not moved beyond an exchange of information on each other’s economic policies.”

- Domenico Lombardi

Director of the Global Economy Program

International Cooperation on Financial Regulation

30%

Question: How much progress has been made in international cooperation on financial regulation in the last year?

“International momentum behind the international financial regulatory agenda has been fading and, as a result, no meaningful progress has been achieved.”

- Domenico Lombardi

Director of the Global Economy Program

Development

30%

Question: How much progress has been made in cooperation on international development in the last year?

“Besides declaratory statements, there is increasing need for bolder action.”

- Domenico Lombardi

Director of the Global Economy Program

Cooperation on Trade

30%

Question: How much progress has been made in agreements on international trade rules and institutional architecture in the last year?

“Multilateral negotiations (Doha round) are at a standstill although the EU and the USA have just launched their negotiations for a bilateral trade and investment agreement.”

- Domenico Lombardi

Director of the Global Economy Program

Cooperation on Climate Change

15%

Question: How much progress, on balance, has been made on climate change in the last year?

“The whole UNFCCC process is flawed — an unending series of communiques rescheduling deadlines and promises that are not kept. Promises are cheap in a process without accountability. There are no national incentives to follow through and implement commitments. It is time to try a new process within a much smaller group — perhaps the trio of the EU, China and the US — or the G20.”

- Domenico Lombardi

Director of the Global Economy Program

Progress Scale

Major Progress 85-100

Estimates between 85% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe, unanticipated major shock to the world economy, preventing sustained unemployment or inflation. International agreements are effective. Key institutions have strengthened their governance and accountability and have the tools and resources required to perform effectively.

Major Progress 80-100

Estimates between 80% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe shock to the world economy and to prevent sustained unemployment or inflation.

Some Progress 70-84

Estimates between 70% and 84% reflect some progress that inspires confidence in the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks Conditions are conducive to inclusive global economic growth.

Some Progress 60-79

Estimates between 60% and 79% reflect conditions that inspire confidence and that are conducive to growth.

Minimal Progress 55-69

Estimates between 55% and 69% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in long term, sustainable balanced growth, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.

Status Quo 45-54

Estimates between 45 and 54% represent stagnation in progress or regression, with low to negligible developments in international discussions or a lack of displayed interest. Public documents exclude mention of the topic or pay minimal due to the issue, with little to no developments in stability or growth.

Minimal Progress 40-59

Estimates between 40% and 59% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in the long term, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.

Minimal Regression 30-44

Estimates between 30 and 44% represent a level of regression sufficient to cause concern for the direction of long term growth. Conditions have not yet worsened significantly, but the global economy shows signs for concern.

Some Regression 20-39

Estimates between 20% and 39% represent some regression, pointing to non-negligible risks to the stability of the world economy if confronted by large-scale shocks.

Some Regression 15-29

Estimates between 15% and 29% represent some regression that instills concern for the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks. Indications suggest insufficient progress and conditions unfavorable to long term growth.

Major Regression 0-14

Estimates between 0% and 14% represent major regression towards a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy. Multilateral negotiations are at a standstill, and key institutions lack the tools and resources to perform effectively.

Major Regression 0-19

Estimates between 0% and 19% represent major regression toward a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy.