Javascript not enabled, please enable javascript in your browser to view this interactive feature.
Progress in International Economic Governance

2014 CIGI Survey of Progress in International Economic Governance

2014 Responses by Expert

Browse full survey responses from each expert by selecting their name below:

Survey Home Quantitative Summary

Barry Carin / 2014 Responses

Overall Ranking

28%

The overall ranking represents the average of all responses provided by the expert — detailed responses to each dimension are provided below. Note that some participants provided their evaluation for a few dimensions only.

Macroeconomic and Financial Cooperation

40%
Question: How much progress has been made on macro-economic and international monetary cooperation in the last year?

"The global economy is on a lower growth track than generally predicted over the last year, and projections for European and Japanese growth prospects are disappointing. On the plus side, the worry that the BRICS Bank would be the beginning of a fragmented system was misplaced. A close reading of the Articles of Agreement indicate that the BRICS Bank will not be an influential player for years, if ever.

In May, Bill White contended that “It’s déja vu, all over again”; referring to 2007 when the global economy was an accident waiting to happen and policy makers failed to see it coming. He argued that the situation we face today is more fraught with danger than in 2007.

The BIS annual report, issued in late June, argued that that the world could not continue to rely on debt as the main engine of growth. That with extraordinary accommodative monetary policy, “countries could at some point find themselves in a debt trap: seeking to stimulate the economy through low interest rates encourages even more debt, ultimately adding to the problem it is meant to solve”. There does not appear to be a Plan B should American inflation increase to the point where it would trigger markets to panic."

- Barry Carin
CIGI Senior Fellow

International Cooperation on Financial Regulation

N/A
No response was provided by Barry Carin for this question.

Cooperation on Trade

25%
Question: How much progress has been made in agreements on international trade rules and institutional architecture in the last year?

"The June 2014 WTO report on the G-20’s standstill pledges to avoid protectionist trade measures, grumbled that “G-20 members put in place 112 new trade restrictive measures during the period mid November 2013 to mid-May 2014.”

On 7 December 2013, at the end of the WTO’s Ninth Ministerial Conference in Bali, Director-General Roberto Azevêdo crowed “the WTO has truly delivered…. The Bali package may have frequently seemed impossible, but now it is done”. But on 31 July 2014, he reported to WTO ambassadors that despite intensive consultations, “we have not been able to find a solution that would allow us to bridge the gap” on the adoption of the protocol on the Trade Facilitation Agreement [the centrepiece of the Bali package]….We have not been able to find a solution that would allow us to bridge that gap. We tried everything we could. But it has not proved possible.”

One glimmer of good news was the July announcement that 14 countries formally launched international negotiations to remove tariffs on the APEC list of environmental goods."

- Barry Carin
CIGI Senior Fellow

Cooperation on Climate Change

20%
Question: How much progress, on balance, has been made on climate change in the last year?

"Atmospheric CO2 reached 399 ppm in July. While China's carbon intensity fell by 5 percent in the first half of 2014, the higher rate of economic growth resulted in an overall increase in annual carbon emissions. The shale revolution is drawing investment away from renewables. Expressions of concern are growing. Even former U.S. Treasury Henry M Paulson argued this June that the time for weighing evidence is past and now it is time for acting – before the problem becomes too big to manage.

There has been no progress in five years since the Durban agreement to negotiate a new treaty in Paris in 2015, to be in force by 2020. The UNFCCC Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) is to prepare a draft treaty text for the Conference of the Parties in December 2014 in Peru. In July, the ADP issued their report, noting that “a substantial [euphemism for unattainable] amount of work remains ahead of us in order to arrive, within more or less the next nine months, at a draft legal text of the proposed agreement”. The co-chairs also posted a “Non-paper” collating the Parties’ views and proposals on the elements of a draft negotiating text. The non-paper notes there is little prospect of agreement on mitigation goals and national commitments; accounting rules and the time frame or on how to reflect finance in the 2015 agreement, including issues referring to scope, nature and sources. Parties are far apart on removing barriers on technology transfer, on institutional arrangements for the provision of finance and on transparency arrangements to meet the needs of the new agreement.

In Paris next year, the UNFCCC will just move the goalposts to 2018 and maintain their process detached from reality."

- Barry Carin
CIGI Senior Fellow

Progress Scale

Major Progress 85-100

Estimates between 85% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe, unanticipated major shock to the world economy, preventing sustained unemployment or inflation. International agreements are effective. Key institutions have strengthened their governance and accountability and have the tools and resources required to perform effectively.

Major Progress 80-100

Estimates between 80% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe shock to the world economy and to prevent sustained unemployment or inflation.

Some Progress 70-84

Estimates between 70% and 84% reflect some progress that inspires confidence in the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks Conditions are conducive to inclusive global economic growth.

Some Progress 60-79

Estimates between 60% and 79% reflect conditions that inspire confidence and that are conducive to growth.

Minimal Progress 55-69

Estimates between 55% and 69% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in long term, sustainable balanced growth, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.

Status Quo 45-54

Estimates between 45 and 54% represent stagnation in progress or regression, with low to negligible developments in international discussions or a lack of displayed interest. Public documents exclude mention of the topic or pay minimal due to the issue, with little to no developments in stability or growth.

Minimal Progress 40-59

Estimates between 40% and 59% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in the long term, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.

Minimal Regression 30-44

Estimates between 30 and 44% represent a level of regression sufficient to cause concern for the direction of long term growth. Conditions have not yet worsened significantly, but the global economy shows signs for concern.

Some Regression 20-39

Estimates between 20% and 39% represent some regression, pointing to non-negligible risks to the stability of the world economy if confronted by large-scale shocks.

Some Regression 15-29

Estimates between 15% and 29% represent some regression that instills concern for the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks. Indications suggest insufficient progress and conditions unfavorable to long term growth.

Major Regression 0-14

Estimates between 0% and 14% represent major regression towards a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy. Multilateral negotiations are at a standstill, and key institutions lack the tools and resources to perform effectively.

Major Regression 0-19

Estimates between 0% and 19% represent major regression toward a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy.