Browse full survey responses from each expert by selecting their name below:
The overall ranking represents the average of all responses provided by the expert — detailed responses to each dimension are provided below. Note that some participants provided their evaluation for a few dimensions only.
"Global macroeconomic performance continues to improve slightly overall, but medium-term prospects do not look favourable. The problem is not a lack of monetary cooperation. The problem is a continuing “fear of fiscal.” Despite a sharp drop in government borrowing in many countries as the recovery has gradually taken hold and “consolidation” has continued. Few, if any governments are willing to use the room to maneuver. Consequently, too much of the policy burden still falls on monetary policy.
These imbalances cause two problems. First, the effectiveness of monetary policy actions is constrained by the zero lower bound on interest rates. Quantitative easing and other unorthodox actions can mitigate the constraints to some extent, but the limited effectiveness is still evident. Second, the longer interest rates remain close to zero, the more incentives will be distorted (away from saving and with limited stimulus to investment).
In addition to this general problem, one must be concerned that the Euro area does not appear to be closer to a sustainable path than it was five years ago. Unemployment in the southern regions remains unsustainably high, and the contrast in the requirements for equilibrium between north and south becomes more of an obstacle the longer it persists. Also, in North America, no one is seriously addressing the sluggishness of the recovery. Even if the U.S. Administration were to put forth a credible plan, founded on a return to fiscal stimulus, the dysfunctional Congress would surely refuse to take it up.
These concerns make a deflation-driven financial crisis ever more likely. In such a scenario, the ongoing failure of the U.S. Congress to approve the 2010 IMF reform package--action that would help ensure that the IMF would have the resources and the credibility to manage the crisis—is especially worrisome."
Estimates between 85% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe, unanticipated major shock to the world economy, preventing sustained unemployment or inflation. International agreements are effective. Key institutions have strengthened their governance and accountability and have the tools and resources required to perform effectively.
Estimates between 80% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe shock to the world economy and to prevent sustained unemployment or inflation.
Estimates between 70% and 84% reflect some progress that inspires confidence in the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks Conditions are conducive to inclusive global economic growth.
Estimates between 60% and 79% reflect conditions that inspire confidence and that are conducive to growth.
Estimates between 55% and 69% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in long term, sustainable balanced growth, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.
Estimates between 45 and 54% represent stagnation in progress or regression, with low to negligible developments in international discussions or a lack of displayed interest. Public documents exclude mention of the topic or pay minimal due to the issue, with little to no developments in stability or growth.
Estimates between 40% and 59% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in the long term, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.
Estimates between 30 and 44% represent a level of regression sufficient to cause concern for the direction of long term growth. Conditions have not yet worsened significantly, but the global economy shows signs for concern.
Estimates between 20% and 39% represent some regression, pointing to non-negligible risks to the stability of the world economy if confronted by large-scale shocks.
Estimates between 15% and 29% represent some regression that instills concern for the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks. Indications suggest insufficient progress and conditions unfavorable to long term growth.
Estimates between 0% and 14% represent major regression towards a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy. Multilateral negotiations are at a standstill, and key institutions lack the tools and resources to perform effectively.
Estimates between 0% and 19% represent major regression toward a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy.