Javascript not enabled, please enable javascript in your browser to view this interactive feature.
Progress in International Economic Governance

2015 CIGI Survey of Progress in International Economic Governance

2015 Responses by Expert

Browse full survey responses from each expert by selecting their name below:

Survey Home Quantitative Summary

Malcolm D. Knight / 2015 Responses

Overall Ranking

55%

The overall ranking represents the average of all responses provided by the expert — detailed responses to each dimension are provided below. Note that some participants provided their evaluation for a few dimensions only.

Macroeconomic and Financial Cooperation

45%
Question: How much progress has been made on macro-economic and international monetary cooperation in the last year?

Thus far in 2015 macroeconomic developments have been dominated by uncertainties: for example, in the euro zone because of the continuing severe sovereign debt problems of Greece; and in China because of concerns over output growth prospects, high volatility in domestic equity markets and investor concern that banking system stability is being eroded by a large and growing portfolio of non-performing loans. In the face of these challenges coordination of macroeconomic policies appears, if anything, to have weakened somewhat over the course of the year. Not surprisingly, no major countries have shown a willingness to adjust their policies with a view to strengthening the global macroeconomic outlook. Policy uncertainty has also been added by the reluctance of the US Federal Reserve to begin normalizing its policy interest rate from the current highly accommodative level to a more neutral stance, despite the recent strengthening trend of growth and employment in United States economy.

- Malcolm D. Knight
CIGI Distinguished Fellow

International Cooperation on Financial Regulation

75%
Question: How much progress has been made in international cooperation on financial regulation in the last year?

Coordinated by the Financial Stability Board, financial regulators have continued to make progress in elaborating the design of the G20’s seven-year initiative to reform the global architecture of financial regulation. Nevertheless, many lacunae remain to be addressed in order to complete the design. For example, in the runup to the G20 Antalya Summit it will be crucial to obtain the empirical results for the quantitative impact assessments of the proposed new rules for total loss absorbing capital of global systemically-important banks and other financial institutions. But even if this goal is met, the main challenge in achieving the G20 leaders’ ambitious financial regulatory objectives will be to ensure internationally harmonized implementation of key financial regulatory reforms across G20 member jurisdictions.

- Malcolm D. Knight
CIGI Distinguished Fellow

Development

40%
Question: How much progress has been made in cooperation on international development in the last year?

The many initiatives that are being announced in terms of development goals, investment targets, and sectoral initiatives cannot mask the fact that little concrete progress is being made on the ground.

- Malcolm D. Knight
CIGI Distinguished Fellow

Cooperation on Trade

50%
Question: How much progress has been made in agreements on international trade rules and institutional architecture in the last year?

- Malcolm D. Knight
CIGI Distinguished Fellow

Cooperation on Climate Change

65%
Question: How much progress, on balance, has been made on climate change in the last year?

- Malcolm D. Knight
CIGI Distinguished Fellow

Progress Scale

Major Progress 85-100

Estimates between 85% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe, unanticipated major shock to the world economy, preventing sustained unemployment or inflation. International agreements are effective. Key institutions have strengthened their governance and accountability and have the tools and resources required to perform effectively.

Major Progress 80-100

Estimates between 80% and 100% represent the ability to withstand the pressures of a severe shock to the world economy and to prevent sustained unemployment or inflation.

Some Progress 70-84

Estimates between 70% and 84% reflect some progress that inspires confidence in the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks Conditions are conducive to inclusive global economic growth.

Some Progress 60-79

Estimates between 60% and 79% reflect conditions that inspire confidence and that are conducive to growth.

Minimal Progress 55-69

Estimates between 55% and 69% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in long term, sustainable balanced growth, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.

Status Quo 45-54

Estimates between 45 and 54% represent stagnation in progress or regression, with low to negligible developments in international discussions or a lack of displayed interest. Public documents exclude mention of the topic or pay minimal due to the issue, with little to no developments in stability or growth.

Minimal Progress 40-59

Estimates between 40% and 59% indicate a level of progress sufficient to inspire confidence in the long term, but with non-negligible risks to the world economy if confronted by shocks.

Minimal Regression 30-44

Estimates between 30 and 44% represent a level of regression sufficient to cause concern for the direction of long term growth. Conditions have not yet worsened significantly, but the global economy shows signs for concern.

Some Regression 20-39

Estimates between 20% and 39% represent some regression, pointing to non-negligible risks to the stability of the world economy if confronted by large-scale shocks.

Some Regression 15-29

Estimates between 15% and 29% represent some regression that instills concern for the stability of the world economy against large-scale shocks. Indications suggest insufficient progress and conditions unfavorable to long term growth.

Major Regression 0-14

Estimates between 0% and 14% represent major regression towards a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy. Multilateral negotiations are at a standstill, and key institutions lack the tools and resources to perform effectively.

Major Regression 0-19

Estimates between 0% and 19% represent major regression toward a fractious and chaotic international system, with significant risks to the stability of the world economy.